uplyst.Connect controls to the evidence behind them
Make the relationship between a requirement, a control and its supporting evidence easier to examine.
Inspect a control reviewOne control. A specific period. Visible gaps.
Access review · Q2 2026
| Record | Scope | Review state |
|---|---|---|
| Policy version 4 | Approved process definition | Current policy; not proof of execution |
| Access export · 30 June | UK operating entity | Collected; owner review pending |
| Reviewer approval | Q2 access population | Missing evidence |
Scroll to view all columns
A current policy and a collected export do not establish that the review was completed.
Find the records behind a control
Control registers describe a process, while the records of that process sit in tickets, access logs, approvals and policy repositories. An assurance team needs to connect the requirement with its owner and the records that show what happened.
Compliance intelligence brings those relationships together for review. Obligations, controls, supporting records and exceptions remain connected to their responsible owners. Legal and regulatory interpretation stays with the appropriate specialists.
Keep the coverage and status clear
A record may cover one entity, period or control instance. Its source, collection date and review status establish what it can support. A published policy and a record showing the policy was followed serve different purposes.
Provenance links a record to the people, systems and activities that produced it. Retention rules and integrity controls preserve that history so reviewers can establish where supporting information came from.
Assign exceptions to the right owner
Start with the missing, stale or contradictory evidence. Identify the requirement and the affected operating process. Present the control owner with the relevant records and a clear choice of investigation, remediation or documented acceptance through the approved governance process.
| Evidence dimension | Review question |
|---|---|
| Scope | Which entity, process and period does this cover? |
| Origin | Which system or person produced the record? |
| Status | Has an authorized reviewer assessed it? |
| Change history | What was corrected or superseded after review? |
Follow evidence through the control cycle
A missing record or outdated policy can leave a control review incomplete. Linking the requirement, applicable policy version and review status helps the owner identify what remains outstanding.
Time spent locating records, repeated requests and unresolved gaps show where evidence collection needs improvement. Corrections made after review remain part of the history for the next control cycle.
Discuss your priorities with us.
- Connect obligations, controls and operational evidence
- Expose scope and freshness gaps during review
- Preserve accountable decisions and their supporting records